Showing posts with label Prop 19. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Prop 19. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Ca.'s Prop 19 and My Medical Marijuana Recommendation


While we have all been hoping and waiting a very long time to see the headlines, “California Legalizes Marijuana“, the Nov. 2nd vote is now just a short 34 days away. I can’t begin to explain how very much I want us to blaze a new trail for the rest of the nation in correcting our backwards drug policies regarding this harmless substance. Are we not as forward thinking as the Netherlands and Portugal, who’s countries have not fallen into chaos because they legally recognized marijuana use.

As opposed to the U.S. Fed Gov, the World Health Organization agreed with marijuana legalization by stating, “On existing patterns of use, cannabis poses a much less serious public health problem than is currently posed by alcohol and tobacco in Western societies.”

I know that there are a lot of MMJ patients that are curious about how the newly legal recreational marijuana consumption by those over 21 will affect medical marijuana patients. It’s more than a little disingenuous for the Yes On 19 camp to publish, as they plainly do on their “Medical FAQ” page that absolutely no part of Prop 19 will affect the medicinal marijuana patient or collective owner. Yes, it’s true the medical marijuana patient will still have all the same legal coverage as they did before, all while lowering the burden of taxes on medical cannabis patients and dispensaries. The problem is that one can’t help but wonder what will happen to your favorite collectives after the flood-gates are opened to big business and how that might affect the current medical marijuana collective business model.

While it seems that most of the fallout from P19 is so vague, it’s exceptionally tough to address. Some broader questions are much easier ponder. 1.) Will the preponderance of medical marijuana patients who do not have seriously debilitating illness’ (patients such as myself, who use marijuana medicinally but are not currently ill) … will we no longer try to or be able to obtain medical recommendations? 2.) Will the market become inundated with marijuana business in certain socio economic areas? 3.) Will marijuana use be converted into an even bigger stick within child custody battles because of the provisions about child endangerment and adult consumption? 4.) MMJ Patient can grow “X” amount while recreational users can only grow “x” … who will grow their own marijuana? 5.) What will the Feds do? … and last, but not least, the most important question out there…Should I keep my medical marijuana recommendation current until the fed’s are done going after California for Prop 19…. YES!

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Will Prop 19 Puff, Puff, PASS!!

Well, it seems according to the L.A. Times, that so far, the "yes" on Prop. 19 proponents have gone out and collected quite a large war chest, which represents a huge monetary advantage of $1.78 million to somewhere around $61,600 against Prop 19, with a large amount of the 'yes' funds is coming from a single source.

Prop 19 Supporters:

While the majority of Pro Prop 19 monies came from those groups associated with Oakersterdam, the Medical Marijuana College whose creator Richard Lee is Prop. 19's greatest supporter and have given more than half a million dollars. Some of the other big backers in this epic battle include $100,000 from Phil Harvey of DKT International in North Carolina, and says it is "largest private provider of contraceptives and family planning services in the developing world"; $5,000 from Berkeley Patients Group; $1,449.47 from Yes We Cannabis; a clever $420 donation came from Darrel Claridge, a financial planner for City National Bank; $20,000 from Dustin Moscovitz, co-founder of Asana; $12,689 from the president of the California chapter of Norml, the marijuana reform group; $1,500 from Etienne Fontan of Berkeley Patients Group; $20,500 from George Zimmer, CEO of Men's Warehouse ("You're gonna like the way you look"); $1,000 came from Marsha Rosenbaum of the JK Irwin Foundation; at least $5,000 came from an L.A. photographer named Alexander Campbell; $2,000 from a Google software engineer named Nathan Gaylinn and, at least 25,000 came from Odam LA Collective.

Pro Prop 19:

Support


Prop 19 Detractors:

Meanwhile on the opposing "no" side of Prop 19, nearly all the cash has come in large donations from police and prosecutor groups. For instance, The California Narcotics Officers Association gave $20,500; the California Police Chiefs Association gave $30,000; California Peace Officers Association gave $5,000; and the Peace Officers Association of L.A. County gave another $5,000. They seem to have erected a blue wall of misinformation.

As any astute observer of the news has noticed, the Prop 19 polls vacillate from pass to fail, and it's truly anyone's guess where this will end up.

Last week, “No” on P.19 received a small victory when Sen. Feinstein became the co-chair of the anti-Prop 19 campaign, As well L.A. County Sheriff Lee Baca. The dark horse in this race is the state Chamber of Commerce which has come out against Prop. 19 and could feasibly use its deep pockets to rage against Prop 19.

For the time being, the Pro Prop 19 camp shows superior funding. The big hanging question is whether opponents such as the religious right (think LDS church, and gay marriage) will rally and manage to beat it. Lets us all pray for a happy Nov. 3rd morning.


Con Prop 19:

Oppose